![]() ![]() The ground doesn't look too conducive for capturing fine details, but you'd still expect some evidence of tread somewhere in the track. It is oddly wide though, and there's no tread I can see. A different commenter said, "It doesn't look crazy large compared to your foot, at least length-wise, which makes me lean towards human. Nothing else." But even the non-believers weren't sure. One said, "Looks just like a washed-out boot print," and another wrote, "Def a regular old footprint. I'd reach out to the local BFRSO in your area ASAP." The upper foot impression is relative to the lower width and diameter of the depth. Good find!" while another stated, "I wish the print was more fresh but this really does look more like a Bigfoot track," and a third chimed in, "What a solid print." Someone else added, "Definitely Sasquatch. Two Point Hospital is adding a free co-operative challenge feature later this month If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive. One person wrote, "This is the first imprint I have seen that isn't clearly a bear. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |